Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 10, 2024

Garner v. FBI

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-03291
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Garner v. FBI, Judge Swain transferred the action to Wisconsin because venue was improper.

Who this affects

Theresa Garner's Federal Tort Claims Act case was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of Wisconsin; the opinion did not decide the underlying claims.

What happened

Garner v. FBI is a case brought by Theresa Garner, without a lawyer, against the Federal Bureau of Investigation under the Federal Tort Claims Act. She filed the case in the Southern District of New York.

The court concluded that the Southern District of New York was not a proper location for the case. Garner lives in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, and she did not allege that the events supporting her claims occurred in that district.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain transferred the action to the Eastern District of Wisconsin in the interest of justice. The court also left any decision about proceeding without paying filing fees to the receiving court, directed that no summons issue from the Southern District of New York, and denied fee-free status for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Garner v. FBI · No. 1:24-cv-03291
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 10, 2024

Background

Theresa Garner brought a case without a lawyer against the Federal Bureau of Investigation under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The case was filed in the Southern District of New York.

Venue analysis

The court applied 28 U.S.C. § 1402(b), which provides that a Federal Tort Claims Act case may be brought only in the federal district where the plaintiff resides or where the complained-of act or omission occurred. The court stated that Garner resides in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, which is within the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

Garner appeared to allege that events supporting her claims occurred in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin; Arizona; Niagara Falls, New York; and possibly elsewhere. She did not allege that any supporting events occurred in the Southern District of New York. The court therefore concluded that the Southern District of New York was not a proper venue, while the Eastern District of Wisconsin was a proper venue.

Ruling

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), a court may dismiss a case filed in the wrong venue or, in the interest of justice, transfer it to a district where it could have been brought. Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the Clerk to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

The court stated that the receiving court would decide whether Garner could proceed without prepaying fees. It directed that no summons issue from the Southern District of New York and closed the action in that court. The court also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.