Dante v. Ralphs Supermarket
- Laura Swain
- 1:24-cv-03522
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In Dante v. Ralphs Supermarket, Judge Swain ordered Raphael Dante to pay filing fees or submit an amended fee-waiver application within 30 days.
Raphael Dante, who must either pay the $405 in fees or submit an amended application to proceed without prepaying fees within 30 days; the action will be dismissed if he does not comply.
What happened
In Dante v. Ralphs Supermarket, Raphael Dante filed a lawsuit without paying the required fees or submitting a completed application to proceed without paying them in advance. He instead filed a request to proceed without paying fees on appeal. The court found that his submission did not provide enough information to show that he could not pay, including because it listed more than $500,000 in monthly expenses without identifying any income source.
The court ordered Dante, within 30 days, either to pay $405 in fees or submit an amended application answering the relevant questions and stating facts showing that he cannot pay. The court did not issue a summons at this time. If Dante does not comply within the allowed time, the action will be dismissed.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain also certified that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal.
The detailed version
- Dante v. Ralphs Supermarket · No. 1:24-cv-03522
- Laura Swain
- May 14, 2024
Background
Raphael Dante brought this civil action without a lawyer. To begin a civil action in the Southern District of New York, a plaintiff must either pay $405 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee—or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees, commonly called an application to proceed in forma pauperis.
Dante filed the complaint without paying the fees or submitting a completed application for this court. Instead, he filed a motion seeking permission to proceed without prepaying fees on appeal. The court considered that submission as a possible request for permission to proceed without prepaying fees in this case, but found that it did not provide enough information to determine that Dante could not pay. In particular, the submission stated that he had more than $500,000 in monthly expenses but did not identify any source of income from which he paid those expenses.
Order
The court ordered Dante to do one of two things within 30 days of the order: pay the $405 in fees, or submit an amended application to proceed without prepaying fees. The amended application must answer all relevant questions and allege facts establishing that Dante cannot pay the filing fees. It must also identify docket number 24-CV-3522 (LTS). If the court grants the amended application, Dante may proceed without prepaying the fees.
The court ordered that no summons issue at that time. It stated that, if Dante complies with the order, the case will be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If he does not comply within the allowed time, the action will be dismissed.
Appeal-related ruling
The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.