Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 14, 2024

Dante v. Ralphs Supermarket

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-03522
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Dante v. Ralphs Supermarket, Judge Swain ordered Raphael Dante to pay filing fees or submit an amended fee-waiver application within 30 days.

Who this affects

Raphael Dante, who must either pay the $405 in fees or submit an amended application to proceed without prepaying fees within 30 days; the action will be dismissed if he does not comply.

What happened

In Dante v. Ralphs Supermarket, Raphael Dante filed a lawsuit without paying the required fees or submitting a completed application to proceed without paying them in advance. He instead filed a request to proceed without paying fees on appeal. The court found that his submission did not provide enough information to show that he could not pay, including because it listed more than $500,000 in monthly expenses without identifying any income source.

The court ordered Dante, within 30 days, either to pay $405 in fees or submit an amended application answering the relevant questions and stating facts showing that he cannot pay. The court did not issue a summons at this time. If Dante does not comply within the allowed time, the action will be dismissed.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also certified that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Dante v. Ralphs Supermarket · No. 1:24-cv-03522
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 14, 2024

Background

Raphael Dante brought this civil action without a lawyer. To begin a civil action in the Southern District of New York, a plaintiff must either pay $405 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee—or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees, commonly called an application to proceed in forma pauperis.

Dante filed the complaint without paying the fees or submitting a completed application for this court. Instead, he filed a motion seeking permission to proceed without prepaying fees on appeal. The court considered that submission as a possible request for permission to proceed without prepaying fees in this case, but found that it did not provide enough information to determine that Dante could not pay. In particular, the submission stated that he had more than $500,000 in monthly expenses but did not identify any source of income from which he paid those expenses.

Order

The court ordered Dante to do one of two things within 30 days of the order: pay the $405 in fees, or submit an amended application to proceed without prepaying fees. The amended application must answer all relevant questions and allege facts establishing that Dante cannot pay the filing fees. It must also identify docket number 24-CV-3522 (LTS). If the court grants the amended application, Dante may proceed without prepaying the fees.

The court ordered that no summons issue at that time. It stated that, if Dante complies with the order, the case will be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If he does not comply within the allowed time, the action will be dismissed.

Appeal-related ruling

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.