Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 14, 2024

New Hampshire Insurance Company v. Scottsdale Insurance Company

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:23-cv-07306
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

New Hampshire Insurance v. Scottsdale Insurance: Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice and without costs.

Who this affects

New Hampshire Insurance Company and Scottsdale Insurance Company, whose case was dismissed after the court was notified that they had reached an agreement on all issues.

What happened

New Hampshire Insurance Company v. Scottsdale Insurance Company was resolved after the court was notified that the parties had reached an agreement on all issues through the magistrate. The order does not describe the agreement's terms.

The court canceled all scheduled conferences and deadlines, dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, and directed the Clerk to close the case and terminate all open motions. The parties may ask to reopen the case within 30 days if they show good cause.

Judge Valerie Caproni issued the order. She also said the parties could ask the court to retain authority to enforce their settlement by submitting the agreement and a jurisdiction request within the same 30-day period.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
New Hampshire Insurance Company v. Scottsdale Insurance Company · No. 1:23-cv-07306
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
May 14, 2024

Background

The court was notified on May 13, 2024, that an agreement had been reached on all issues through the magistrate. The order does not state the agreement's terms or identify the underlying claims.

Court's Order

The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. It directed the Clerk of Court to terminate all open motions and close the case.

The parties were permitted to apply to reopen the case within 30 days. Any such application had to show good cause for keeping the case open in light of the settlement. The court stated that a request filed after 30 days, or without a showing of good cause, could be denied on that basis alone.

The court also explained that, if the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction—meaning continuing authority—to enforce their settlement agreement, they had to submit the agreement under Rule 7.A of the court's Individual Practices and request an order expressly retaining that jurisdiction within the same 30-day period.

Disposition

Judge Valerie Caproni dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, canceled the scheduled conferences and deadlines, terminated the open motions, and closed the case. The order also provided the stated 30-day procedures for reopening the case or requesting retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.