Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 13, 2024

Williams v. Frisina

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-03558
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Williams v. Frisina, Chief Judge Swain transferred the prisoner’s civil-rights case to the Northern District of New York for convenience.

Who this affects

Robert Williams and the named defendants; the case will proceed, if permitted by the receiving court, in the Northern District of New York.

What happened

Robert Williams sued D. Frisina and other defendants without a lawyer under a federal civil-rights law, alleging violations at Wallkill Correctional Facility.

The court said the events occurred in Ulster County, within the Northern District of New York, and that relevant witnesses and documents were likely there. It therefore found that district more convenient, even though it was unclear where the defendants lived.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the case transferred to the Northern District of New York. The Southern District closed the case, left any decision about proceeding without paying filing fees to the receiving court, and denied fee-free status for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Williams v. Frisina · No. 1:24-cv-03558
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 13, 2024

Background

Robert Williams, who is incarcerated at Woodbourne Correctional Facility, brought this lawsuit without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleged that D. Frisina, S. Jackson, Phil Melecio, and a John Doe correction officer violated his rights at Wallkill Correctional Facility. The opinion does not describe the underlying alleged violations.

Venue and Transfer

The court explained that federal law permits a civil case to be filed where a defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or, in limited circumstances, where a defendant is subject to the court’s authority. Williams did not allege where the defendants lived. He did allege that the events occurred at Wallkill Correctional Facility, which is in Ulster County and therefore in the Northern District of New York.

The court concluded that the Northern District of New York was an available and more convenient forum under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). The events occurred at Wallkill Correctional Facility, where the defendants worked, and the court found it reasonable to expect that relevant witnesses and documents would also be there.

Disposition

The court transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. The Clerk was directed to transfer the case, and summonses were not to issue from the Southern District of New York. The court left to the receiving court the question whether Williams could continue without paying filing fees and closed the case in the Southern District. Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. The order addressed venue and convenience rather than the merits of Williams’s allegations.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.