Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 17, 2024

Panfil v. Han

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-01546
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Panfil v. Han, Judge Swain ordered Panfil to pay filing fees or submit an application to proceed without prepaying them.

Who this affects

Dorin Panfil, whose case cannot proceed until the required payment or a completed and signed application to proceed without prepaying fees is received; failure to comply may result in dismissal without prejudice to refiling.

What happened

Panfil v. Han is a civil case submitted to the Southern District of New York by email. The court assigned it docket number 24-CV-1546 (LTS).

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Panfil v. Han · No. 1:24-cv-01546
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 17, 2024

Background Dorin Panfil submitted this civil action against Zhang Han to the court by email. The court explained that a plaintiff must either pay the required filing fees or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying those fees. The total required payment was $405, consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee.

Order The court ordered Panfil, within 30 days of the order, either to pay the $405 or complete, sign, and submit the attached application to proceed without prepaying fees. The order gave instructions for paying by mail or in person. No further action would be taken, and no summons or answer would be required, until payment or a completed application was received.

Ruling and Effect Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered that, if Panfil complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If the court granted the application, Panfil could proceed without prepaying fees. If Panfil failed to comply or failed to request more time, the action would be dismissed without prejudice to refiling. The court also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.