Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 20, 2024

Alexander v. Groder

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-03858
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Alexander v. Groder, Judge Swain transferred the action to the Eastern District of New York because venue was improper.

Who this affects

Holmes Alexander’s lawsuit was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York. Jeffrey Scott Groder and James E. Dzurenda remain defendants, and the transferee court will decide whether Alexander may proceed without prepaying filing fees.

What happened

In Alexander v. Groder, Holmes Alexander, who is incarcerated and proceeding without a lawyer, sued Jeffrey Scott Groder and James E. Dzurenda under a federal civil-rights law. He alleged that Dzurenda falsely arrested him and that Groder failed to protect his rights during related state criminal proceedings.

The court found that the claims arose in Nassau County, where the defendants worked and where the alleged events occurred. Because Nassau County is in the Eastern District of New York, the court concluded that the Southern District of New York was not the proper venue.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the case transferred to the Eastern District of New York in the interest of justice. The transferee court will decide whether Alexander may continue without paying filing fees; the Southern District case was closed, and no summons was issued there.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Alexander v. Groder · No. 1:24-cv-03858
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 20, 2024

Background

Holmes Alexander, who is incarcerated at Fishkill Correctional Facility and is proceeding without a lawyer, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleged that James E. Dzurenda falsely arrested him and that Jeffrey Scott Groder, identified as Alexander’s criminal defense attorney, failed to protect his rights during the related state criminal proceedings. The opinion states that the events occurred in Nassau County, New York.

Venue

Venue is the proper federal district for a lawsuit. The court explained that a case generally may be filed where a defendant resides or where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred. Alexander did not allege the defendants’ residences, but he alleged events in Nassau County, and the defendants were employed there. The court therefore concluded that venue was not proper in the Southern District of New York and that the action could have been brought in the Eastern District of New York, which includes Nassau County.

Ruling

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), a court may dismiss a case filed in the wrong venue or transfer it when transfer would serve the interests of justice. Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the Clerk of Court to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The court did not decide whether Alexander’s allegations were legally valid or whether he would ultimately prevail.

The order states that the Eastern District of New York will decide whether Alexander may proceed without prepaying filing fees because he did not submit the required prisoner authorization form. The Southern District court directed that no summons issue, closed the case there, and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.