Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 20, 2024

Janczuk v. Federal Trade Commission

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-03716
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

Janczuk v. Federal Trade Commission: Judge Swain dismissed the duplicative Fair Credit Reporting Act action without prejudice and denied appeal fee-waiver status.

Who this affects

Weronika Janczuk’s duplicative action was dismissed without prejudice; her separate pending action was not dismissed by this order. The Federal Trade Commission and the other defendants were affected by the dismissal of this action.

What happened

In Janczuk v. Federal Trade Commission, Weronika Janczuk brought a Fair Credit Reporting Act case seeking a court order requiring action against the defendants. She represented herself.

The court said Janczuk had already filed an identical complaint in a separate case that was still pending. Because this case raised the same claims, the court found that continuing it would serve no useful purpose.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed this case without prejudice as duplicative, leaving Janczuk’s pending case unaffected. Judge Swain also denied permission to proceed without paying fees on any appeal and directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Janczuk v. Federal Trade Commission · No. 1:24-cv-03716
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 20, 2024

Background

Weronika Janczuk, appearing without a lawyer, sued the Federal Trade Commission and other defendants under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. She sought injunctive relief, meaning a court order requiring or prohibiting certain conduct.

The court stated that Janczuk had previously filed an identical complaint against the defendants in a separate action, No. 1:24-CV-3703 (UA), which was still pending. The court determined that the present action raised the same claims and was duplicative.

Ruling

The court dismissed this action without prejudice as duplicative. This disposition did not bar Janczuk’s pending related action. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal.

The court directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment dismissing the action and to provide Janczuk with the order and judgment through the court’s Pro Se Intake Unit window.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.