Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 21, 2024

Brown v. Nash

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-02824
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Brown v. Nash, Judge Swain dismissed Nkosi S. Brown’s complaint without prejudice for lacking an original signature and denied appeal fee status.

Who this affects

Nkosi S. Brown’s complaint was dismissed without prejudice because he did not submit the required signed signature page. The court also denied him permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal. The opinion does not state the effect on the claims against Dwayne A. Nash and the other defendants beyond ending this complaint.

What happened

In Brown v. Nash, the court had ordered Nkosi S. Brown to resubmit the complaint’s signature page and the application to proceed without paying filing fees, each with an original signature.

Brown did not submit the signed signature page. The court also noted that he had not provided an address, so the Clerk could not mail him a copy of the earlier order.

Judge Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice. She also denied Brown permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal, certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Brown v. Nash · No. 1:24-cv-02824
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 21, 2024

Background

Nkosi S. Brown sued Dwayne A. Nash and other defendants. On April 18, 2024, the Court directed Brown to resubmit the signature pages of his complaint and his application to proceed without paying filing fees, each bearing an original signature. The Court warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal.

The opinion states that Brown did not submit the signed signature page. It also states that Brown did not provide an address, preventing the Clerk of Court from mailing him a copy of the April 18 order.

Ruling

The Court dismissed the complaint without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a), which requires a party filing a paper with the court to provide an appropriate signature. The court therefore did not decide the underlying claims.

The Court additionally certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying fees for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.