Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 25, 2024

Hickman v. McDonnell

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-02762
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Hickman v. McDonell, Chief Judge Swain ordered payment or an amended fee-waiver application within 30 days.

Who this affects

Quandel Hickman, the incarcerated plaintiff proceeding without a lawyer, must either pay the required fees or submit a complete amended application to proceed without prepaying fees.

What happened

In Hickman v. McDonell, Quandel Hickman, who is incarcerated and representing himself, filed a civil action and submitted a request to proceed without paying filing fees upfront. The court found that the request was incomplete because its second page was missing and it was unsigned.

The court ordered Hickman, within 30 days, either to pay the required $405 in fees or submit an amended application to proceed without prepaying fees. The court directed that any amended application identify docket number 24-CV-2762 (LTS). No summons will issue yet, and the action will be dismissed if Hickman does not comply.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-waiver status for an appeal. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hickman v. McDonnell · No. 1:24-cv-02762
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 25, 2024

Background

Quandel Hickman filed a civil action against A.D.A. Abel McDonell and other defendants. The opinion states that Hickman is incarcerated at the Otis Bantum Correctional Center on Rikers Island and is proceeding without a lawyer. With his complaint, Hickman submitted a prisoner authorization form and an application to proceed without prepaying fees, commonly called an IFP application.

Fee requirement and incomplete application

The court explained that a prisoner filing a civil action must either pay $405 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee—or submit the required signed IFP application and prisoner authorization. Hickman's IFP application was incomplete: its second page was missing, so it lacked certain information and a signature.

Order

The court ordered Hickman, within 30 days of the order's date, either to pay the $405 fee or submit an amended IFP application. The amended application must be labeled with docket number 24-CV-2762 (LTS). No summons will issue at this time. The court stated that the action will be dismissed if Hickman does not comply within the allowed period.

Appeal and other warnings

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal. The order also warned about the possible consequences under the prisoner “three strikes” provision if a federal civil action or appeal is later dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim. This order addressed filing-fee requirements and did not resolve the merits of Hickman's claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.