Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled June 21, 2024

Latimer v. Commissioner of Social Security

Judge
Sidney Stein
Docket
1:24-cv-02571
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Social SecurityCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Latimer v. Commissioner, Judge Stein reversed the Commissioner’s decision and sent the case back for further proceedings.

Who this affects

The plaintiff and the Commissioner of Social Security; the case returns to the Commissioner for further proceedings, including a hearing and a new decision.

What happened

In Latimer v. Commissioner of Social Security, the court addressed a challenge to the Commissioner’s decision. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute.

The court reversed the Commissioner’s decision and sent the case back to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings, including a hearing and a new decision. The judgment states that this result followed a June 21, 2024 stipulation and order.

Judge Sidney Stein presided over the case. The remand was ordered under the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Latimer v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:24-cv-02571
Judge
Sidney Stein
Date
June 21, 2024

Background

The opinion is a judgment in Wendiannelatimer’s action against the Commissioner of Social Security. It does not explain the underlying facts or the specific reasons for challenging the Commissioner’s decision.

Ruling

The judgment states that, for the reasons given in the court’s June 21, 2024 stipulation and order, the Commissioner’s decision was reversed. The action was remanded to the Commissioner under the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings, including the opportunity for a hearing and a new decision.

Disposition

The court entered judgment reversing the Commissioner’s decision and remanding the action for further proceedings. The judgment cites Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.