Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 30, 2023

Liga v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

Judge
Sidney Stein
Docket
1:23-cv-09289
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Social SecurityCivil Procedure
In one sentence

Liga v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration: Judge Rearden denied Liga’s fee-waiver request and ordered payment of the $402 filing fee.

Who this affects

Marianella L Liga, whose request to proceed without paying the filing fee was denied and who was ordered to pay the $402 filing fee within 30 days.

What happened

In Liga v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Liga asked to proceed without paying the court’s filing fee. She reported having $323,000 in assets, receiving loans or borrowed money, and supporting no dependents.

The court denied her request to proceed without paying the fee and ordered her to pay the $402 filing fee within 30 days of the order. The court did not decide the underlying Social Security dispute in this order.

Judge Jennifer H. Rearden also ruled that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, so Liga could not proceed without paying the fee for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Liga v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration · No. 1:23-cv-09289
Judge
Sidney Stein
Date
Oct. 30, 2023

Background

Marianella L Liga moved for permission to proceed without paying the filing fee. In her application, she reported having $323,000 in assets, receiving loans from family or other sources, and having no individuals dependent on her for support.

Ruling

The court denied Liga’s application to proceed without paying the filing fee. It directed her to pay the $402 filing fee within 30 days of the order.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. As a result, permission to proceed without paying the fee was denied for purposes of an appeal. This order addressed only the filing-fee request and did not resolve the underlying Social Security case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.