Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Sept. 17, 2024

Comfort v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security

Judge
Sidney Stein
Docket
1:24-cv-02115
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Social SecurityCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Comfort v. O’Malley, Judge Stein ordered the action reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings.

Who this affects

Robert R. Comfort and Martin O’Malley, Commissioner of Social Security; the case returns to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings.

What happened

Robert R. Comfort brought this action against Martin O’Malley, Commissioner of Social Security. The judgment does not explain the underlying dispute or the reasons for the court’s decision.

On September 17, 2024, the court ordered that the action be reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The judgment states that this ruling was based on the court’s September 17 stipulation and order.

Judge Sidney Stein is identified in the case information. The judgment was dated September 17, 2024, and signed by the acting clerk of court through a deputy clerk.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Comfort v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:24-cv-02115
Judge
Sidney Stein
Date
Sept. 17, 2024

Background

The opinion is a judgment in an action brought by Robert R. Comfort against Martin O’Malley, Commissioner of Social Security. The judgment does not describe the underlying Social Security dispute or identify the specific issue presented.

Ruling

The court ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the action be reversed and remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings. The judgment states that the ruling was made for the reasons given in the court’s September 17, 2024, stipulation and order.

The remand was issued under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), a provision that authorizes a federal court to send a Social Security case back to the Commissioner. The judgment cites Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993). It does not provide further explanation of the court’s reasoning or specify what the Commissioner must address on remand.

Disposition

The action was reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. The judgment is dated September 17, 2024, and was signed by the acting clerk of court through a deputy clerk.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.