Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 6, 2024

Morabito v. Westchester County

Judge
Kenneth Karas
Docket
7:22-cv-06853
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Morabito v. Westchester County, Judge Karas directed service paperwork for eight defendants in Jeffrey Morabito’s case.

Who this affects

Jeffrey Morabito and the eight defendants identified for service—George Latimer, Joseph Spano, Edith Onua, Sara George, Zoeth Stone-Edwards, Eric Paolilli, M.D. Raul Ulloa, and Michael Kunz—as well as the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service handling service.

What happened

In Morabito v. Westchester County, Jeffrey Morabito, representing himself, alleges that the defendants violated his rights by providing inadequate medical treatment for opioid withdrawal symptoms. His claims arise under federal civil-rights, disability, and rehabilitation laws.

Because Morabito was allowed to proceed without paying court fees in advance, the court said he could use the U.S. Marshals Service to serve defendants. Defense counsel agreed to accept service waivers for eight defendants who had not yet been served.

Judge Kenneth M. Karas instructed the Clerk of Court to prepare service-waiver forms and send the required paperwork to the Marshals Service for mailing to defense counsel. The order also reminded Morabito to request more time if service was not waived within 90 days and to notify the court of any address change.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Morabito v. Westchester County · No. 7:22-cv-06853
Judge
Kenneth Karas
Date
Aug. 6, 2024

Background

Jeffrey Morabito brings the action representing himself under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. He alleges that Westchester County, Wellpath LLC, and individual defendants violated his rights and the law by providing inadequate medical treatment for his opioid withdrawal symptoms.

The court previously allowed Morabito to proceed without prepaying filing fees. In such cases, the court and the U.S. Marshals Service assist with serving the defendants. Counsel for all defendants told the court that they agreed to execute waivers of service for their respective clients who had not been served.

Court’s Action

The court instructed the Clerk of Court to complete a waiver-of-service form for each of these eight defendants: George Latimer, Joseph Spano, Edith Onua, Sara George, Zoeth Stone-Edwards, Eric Paolilli, M.D. Raul Ulloa, and Michael Kunz. The Clerk was also asked to provide the Marshals Service with the paperwork required by the forms, including two copies of each completed form, so the Marshals Service could mail them to defense counsel at the addresses appended to the order.

The court stated that if service was not waived within 90 days after the order, Morabito should request an extension of time for service. It also reminded him that he must notify the court in writing if his address changes and that the case could be dismissed if he fails to do so.

Disposition and Significance

The order addressed service of process only. It did not decide whether Morabito’s allegations are legally or factually valid, and it did not rule on the merits of his claims. The Clerk was instructed to prepare and transmit the service paperwork, and the court asked that a copy of the order be mailed to Morabito.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.