Espaillat v. Procida Construction Corp.
- Robert Lehrburger
- 1:24-cv-00294
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Espaillat v. Procida Construction Corp., Judge Lehrburger approved the parties’ FLSA settlement and dismissed the case with prejudice.
The parties to the wage-and-hour case, including Francisco Espaillat and Procida Construction Corp. and the other defendants identified in the caption.
What happened
Espaillat v. Procida Construction Corp. was an action seeking damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. The parties jointly asked the court to approve their settlement agreement.
The court reviewed the agreement and the parties’ submission, considering the risks and costs of continuing the case, possible recovery, the bargaining process, attorney’s fees, and possible fraud or collusion. It noted that the agreement had no confidentiality restrictions, narrowly released wage-and-hour claims, and provided attorney’s fees within a fair and reasonable range.
Judge Robert W. Lehrburger found the settlement fair and reasonable and approved it. Because the case was resolved by settlement, the court dismissed and discontinued it in its entirety, with prejudice, without costs or fees to any party except as provided in the settlement agreement, and directed that the case be closed.
The detailed version
- Espaillat v. Procida Construction Corp. · No. 1:24-cv-00294
- Robert Lehrburger
- Sept. 19, 2024
Background
Francisco Espaillat brought an action for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal wage-and-hour law, and the New York Labor Law. The parties submitted a joint letter asking the court to approve their settlement agreement. A fully executed copy of the agreement was submitted on August 22, 2024, and the parties consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction on September 18, 2024.
Settlement Review
The court explained that a federal court must determine whether an FLSA settlement is fair and reasonable and results from arm’s-length negotiations rather than overreaching. The court reviewed the settlement agreement and the parties’ letter, taking into account the prior proceedings, the risks, burdens, and costs of continuing the case, the possible range of recovery, the bargaining process, attorney’s fees, and the possibility of fraud or collusion.
The court noted that the agreement contained no confidentiality restrictions, limited the release to wage-and-hour claims, and provided attorney’s fees within a fair, reasonable, and acceptable range. Considering all the circumstances, the court found the settlement fair and reasonable and approved it.
Disposition
Because the case was resolved by settlement, Judge Robert W. Lehrburger ordered that it be dismissed and discontinued in its entirety, with prejudice, without costs or fees to any party except as provided in the settlement agreement. The court also directed the Clerk of Court to terminate all motions and deadlines and close the case.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.