Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 11, 2025

Wisniewski v. Johnson Controls, Inc.

Judge
Robert Lehrburger
Docket
1:22-cv-10287
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Wisniewski v. Johnson Controls, Judge Lehrburger approved the FLSA settlement and dismissed the case with prejudice.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and Johnson Controls, Inc.; the settlement resolved and ended the entire case.

What happened

In Wisniewski v. Johnson Controls, the plaintiffs brought claims for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law.

The parties asked the court to approve their settlement after discovery and mediation. The court found the agreement fair and reasonable, noting that it had no confidentiality or non-disparagement provisions and that the release was limited to wage-and-hour claims.

Judge Lehrburger approved the settlement and dismissed the entire case with prejudice, without costs or fees to either party except as provided in the settlement agreement. The court also directed the clerk to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Wisniewski v. Johnson Controls, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-10287
Judge
Robert Lehrburger
Date
Mar. 11, 2025

Background

The plaintiffs sued Johnson Controls, Inc. for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), a federal law governing wages and working hours, and the New York Labor Law. The parties jointly asked the court to approve their settlement agreement.

Settlement Review

The court reviewed the fully signed settlement agreement and the parties’ letter request. The parties reached the agreement after full discovery and work with a private mediator. In deciding whether to approve an FLSA settlement, the court considered the risks, burdens, and costs of continuing the case; the possible recovery; whether the agreement resulted from arm’s-length bargaining; the attorneys’ fees; and the possibility of fraud or collusion.

The court noted that the agreement contained no confidentiality restrictions or non-disparagement provisions. It found that the attorneys’ fees were within a fair and reasonable range. After a change directed by the court, the release was limited to wage-and-hour claims.

Ruling

The court found the settlement agreement fair and reasonable and approved it. Because the case was resolved by settlement, the court dismissed and discontinued the entire case with prejudice, without costs or fees to either party except as provided in the settlement agreement. The court directed the clerk to terminate all motions and deadlines and close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.