Vargas v. Gorillas Technologies US Inc.
- Analisa Torres
- 1:23-cv-08622
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Vargas v. Gorillas Technologies US Inc., Judge Torres ordered the corporation to obtain counsel and file compliance paperwork.
Gorillas Technologies US Inc., which was ordered to obtain licensed counsel and file specified documents; the parties were also given a later deadline for a joint letter and revised settlement agreement.
What happened
In Adolfo Vargas v. Gorillas Technologies US Inc., the court said the corporation appeared to be proceeding without a lawyer. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.
The court ordered Gorillas Technologies US Inc. to obtain legal counsel, have counsel file a notice of appearance, and file a letter confirming compliance by December 20, 2024. If it complied, the parties were to submit a joint letter and revised settlement agreement by January 21, 2025.
Judge Analisa Torres issued the order on November 20, 2024, and directed the Clerk to mail a copy to the corporation.
The detailed version
- Vargas v. Gorillas Technologies US Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-08622
- Analisa Torres
- Nov. 20, 2024
What the court addressed
The court stated that Gorillas Technologies US Inc. appeared to be proceeding without a lawyer. It explained that corporations cannot represent themselves in federal court and may appear only through licensed counsel.
Order
The court ordered Gorillas Technologies US Inc. to:
- Obtain legal counsel;
- File counsel’s notice of appearance through the court’s electronic filing system; and
- File a letter by December 20, 2024, confirming compliance.
If Gorillas Technologies US Inc. complied, the parties were ordered to submit a joint letter and revised settlement agreement by January 21, 2025, as required by the court’s July 12, 2024 order. The Clerk of Court was directed to mail the order to the corporation at the address stated in the opinion.
Disposition
Judge Analisa Torres entered an order requiring the corporate defendant to obtain counsel and complete the specified filings. The opinion does not decide the underlying claims or describe their merits.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.