Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 26, 2025

Buxbaum v. Walt Disney Co.

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:25-cv-02339
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Buxbaum v. Walt Disney Co., Judge Aaron denied Michael Buxbaum’s request for Marshals service because he paid the filing fee.

Who this affects

Michael Buxbaum, who must arrange service on Walt Disney Co. himself.

What happened

In Buxbaum v. Walt Disney Co., Michael Buxbaum, who was representing himself, asked the court to have the U.S. Marshals Service deliver the lawsuit to Walt Disney Co.

Buxbaum filed the case and paid the filing fee. He then sent two letters asking the Marshals Service to serve Disney.

Judge Stewart D. Aaron denied the request because Buxbaum was not proceeding without paying the fee. The order states that Buxbaum must arrange service himself.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Buxbaum v. Walt Disney Co. · No. 1:25-cv-02339
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
Mar. 26, 2025

Background

Michael Buxbaum filed this action on March 20, 2025, and paid the filing fee on March 21, 2025. Buxbaum was representing himself. On March 24, he filed two letters asking the Clerk of Court to have the U.S. Marshals Service serve Walt Disney Co. with the lawsuit.

Ruling

The court denied Buxbaum’s request. The order explains that Buxbaum was not proceeding without paying the filing fee and therefore was not entitled to rely on the U.S. Marshals Service to deliver the lawsuit to Disney. The court ordered Buxbaum to complete service himself.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.