Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 3, 2025

Suresh v. Ace Hotel New York LLC

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:24-cv-07959
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Suresh v. Ace Hotel New York LLC, Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice and without costs, while allowing a 30-day reopening application.

Who this affects

Ajay Suresh, Ace Hotel New York LLC, and Ace Group International, LLC; the case was dismissed with prejudice, subject to the order’s 30-day procedures for possible reopening or retention of authority to enforce the settlement.

What happened

In Ajay Suresh v. Ace Hotel New York LLC and Ace Group International, LLC, the parties told the court that they had reached an agreement resolving all issues.

The court canceled all scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It also dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, and directed the Clerk to close the case.

Judge Valerie Caproni allowed the parties to apply within 30 days to reopen the case if they could show good cause. They could also ask the court to retain authority to enforce their settlement by submitting the agreement and a written request within that period.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Suresh v. Ace Hotel New York LLC · No. 1:24-cv-07959
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Jan. 3, 2025

Background

On December 30, 2024, the parties notified the court that they had reached an agreement on all issues. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

Order

The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.

Within 30 days, the parties could apply to reopen the case. Such an application had to show good cause for keeping the case open despite the settlement, and an application filed after 30 days or without that showing could be denied on that basis alone. If the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction—legal authority—to enforce the settlement, they had to submit the settlement agreement and request that the court expressly retain that authority within the same 30-day period.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.