Feola v. Mueller
- Loretta Preska
- 1:23-cv-03393
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In Feola v. Mueller, Judge Preska granted substitution of Stephanie Feola for deceased plaintiff Elvio Feola.
Stephanie Feola may proceed as executrix of the Estate of Elvio Feola and as the named plaintiff in the action. The ruling also allows the surviving § 1983 claims identified in the opinion to continue through the estate’s representative.
What happened
In Feola v. Mueller, plaintiff Elvio Feola died on November 20, 2024. His attorneys asked the court to substitute his surviving spouse, Stephanie Feola, as the estate’s representative and the plaintiff in the case, and the defendants did not object.
The court found that the request was filed within 90 days of notice of Feola’s death. It also found that his claims under a federal civil-rights law, alleging violations of the Eighth Amendment, survived his death under New York law. Stephanie Feola was a proper replacement because she was named executor of his will and the estate’s sole beneficiary.
Judge Loretta A. Preska granted the unopposed request to substitute Stephanie Feola as executrix of the Estate of Elvio Feola and named plaintiff. The Clerk was directed to close docket number 105.
The detailed version
- Feola v. Mueller · No. 1:23-cv-03393
- Loretta Preska
- Feb. 3, 2025
Background
Elvio Feola was the plaintiff in this action. He died on November 20, 2024. His attorneys moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1) to substitute Stephanie Feola as the representative of his estate and as the plaintiff. The motion stated that Stephanie Feola was Feola’s surviving spouse, the named executor of his will, and the sole beneficiary of his estate. She had filed a probate petition in Bronx Surrogate Court and was awaiting her letters. Counsel for the state-representative defendant and the non-state-representative defendants indicated that they did not object.
Court’s Analysis
Rule 25(a)(1) allows a deceased party’s successor or representative to be substituted when the claim is not extinguished. The court described three requirements: the request must be timely, the claims must survive the party’s death, and the proposed substitute must be a proper party.
The court found the request timely because the court and the parties were notified of Feola’s death on November 21, 2024, and the motion was filed within 90 days of that notice. The court further found that all claims in the complaint were brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for alleged Eighth Amendment violations. Under the law discussed in the opinion, such civil-rights claims survive death when applicable state law provides for survival. The court concluded that New York law allows these claims to survive and be asserted by the deceased person’s representative. Finally, the court found Stephanie Feola qualified as a proper party because she was named executor and sole beneficiary of the estate.
Ruling
Judge Loretta A. Preska granted the plaintiff’s unopposed request to substitute Stephanie Feola, as executrix of the Estate of Elvio Feola, as the named plaintiff. The Clerk of Court was directed to close docket number 105.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.