Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 25, 2025

Redwine v. Eischen

Judge
Jerry Blackwell
Docket
0:24-cv-00790
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
1
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Redwine v. Eischen, Judge Blackwell denied Terrance Redwine’s petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 after accepting an unobjected-to recommendation.

Who this affects

Terrance Redwine’s § 2241 habeas petition was denied. The respondent was B. Eischen, identified as the Warden of FPC Duluth.

What happened

In Redwine v. Eischen, Terrance Redwine asked the court for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright issued a report and recommendation on January 21, 2025.

No one filed objections within the permitted time. The district court reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.

Judge Jerry W. Blackwell accepted the recommendation and denied Redwine’s habeas petition. The court ordered that judgment be entered.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Redwine v. Eischen · No. 0:24-cv-00790
Judge
Jerry W. Blackwell
Date
Feb. 25, 2025

Background

Terrance Redwine filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 against B. Eischen, identified in the caption as the Warden of FPC Duluth. United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright issued a Report and Recommendation on January 21, 2025.

Court’s Review

No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed within the allowed time. The district court therefore reviewed it for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake apparent from the record. The court found no clear error. The opinion does not state the underlying reasons for the recommendation or explain the substance of Redwine’s habeas claims.

Ruling

Judge Jerry W. Blackwell ordered that the January 21, 2025 Report and Recommendation be accepted. The court denied Terrance Redwine’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and directed that judgment be entered.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.