Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 25, 2025

Townsquare Media, Inc. v. Regency Furniture, Inc.

Judge
Kenneth Karas
Docket
7:21-cv-04695
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Fee PetitionDiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Townsquare Media v. Regency Furniture, Judge Karas granted Regency Furniture $1,513.15 for deposition-related attorneys’ fees and costs.

Who this affects

Regency Furniture, Inc. received an award of $1,513.15 in attorneys’ fees and costs from its fee application against Townsquare Media, Inc., following sanctions related to Townsquare Media’s discovery obligations.

What happened

Townsquare Media, Inc. v. Regency Furniture, Inc. concerned Regency Furniture’s request for fees and costs after the Court sanctioned Townsquare Media for failing to meet discovery obligations involving corporate witness Brian Lang’s testimony. Townsquare Media did not oppose the request.

Regency Furniture requested $1,080 in attorneys’ fees and $433.15 in costs. The Court found reasonable the attorney’s $540 hourly rate, two hours spent preparing for and attending the testimony, and the itemized costs for the transcript and video services.

Judge Kenneth M. Karas granted Regency Furniture’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $1,513.15. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate the pending motion.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Townsquare Media, Inc. v. Regency Furniture, Inc. · No. 7:21-cv-04695
Judge
Kenneth Karas
Date
Mar. 25, 2025

Background

The Court considered a fee application submitted by Regency Furniture in connection with sanctions previously imposed against Townsquare Media. The sanctions arose from Townsquare Media’s failure to meet its discovery obligations under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6) concerning corporate designee Brian Lang’s testimony. Townsquare Media did not oppose the fee application.

Regency Furniture requested $1,080.00 in attorneys’ fees and $433.15 in costs. It submitted contemporaneous time records identifying the attorney, dates, hours, and work performed, along with receipts for expenses associated with Lang’s testimony.

Court’s Analysis

The Court explained that a presumptively reasonable attorneys’ fee is generally calculated using the lodestar method: a reasonable hourly rate multiplied by a reasonable number of hours. The relevant hourly rate is based on the prevailing market rate for lawyers in the district. The Court also considered the experience of Regency Furniture’s attorney, Mr. Frank, who was the managing attorney of a commercial litigation boutique and had practiced for forty-two years. Based on comparable rates previously approved in the district, the Court found his requested hourly rate of $540.00 reasonable.

The Court found that Mr. Frank’s documented two hours of work—one hour preparing for and one hour attending Lang’s testimony—were reasonable. It also found the requested $433.15 in costs adequately supported. Those costs consisted of $323.15 for the transcript and $110.00 for video services associated with the testimony.

Disposition

Judge Kenneth M. Karas granted Regency Furniture’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $1,513.15: $1,080.00 in attorneys’ fees and $433.15 in costs. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate the pending motion, identified as Docket Number 90.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.