Rios-Nunez v. United States
- Laura Provinzino
- 0:25-cv-01056
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 1
In Rios-Nunez v. United States, Judge Provinzino adopted the recommendation and dismissed the petition without prejudice.
Ever Rios-Nunez’s petition was dismissed without prejudice; the United States was the respondent.
What happened
In Rios-Nunez v. United States, Ever Rios-Nunez filed a petition against the United States. The opinion does not explain the petition’s underlying claim.
A magistrate judge recommended denying the petition. No party objected, so the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake.
Judge Laura M. Provinzino found no clear error, adopted the recommendation in full, and dismissed the petition without prejudice. The opinion does not state the reasons for the recommended denial.
The detailed version
- Rios-Nunez v. United States · No. 0:25-cv-01056
- Laura M. Provinzino
- May 30, 2025
Background
Ever Rios-Nunez filed a petition against the United States. The opinion identifies it as a habeas petition but does not describe the underlying claim or the relief sought.
Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and Recommendation on April 28, 2025, recommending denial of the petition. No party objected to that recommendation.
Court’s review
Because no party objected, the court reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake apparent from the record. The court found no clear error and adopted the Report and Recommendation in full.
Disposition
Judge Laura M. Provinzino ordered that the Report and Recommendation be adopted in full and that the petition be dismissed without prejudice. The order directed that judgment be entered. The opinion does not state the basis for the recommended denial or dismissal.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.