Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 7, 2025

Eumori v. Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:24-cv-03531
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

Judge Caproni dismissed Atelier Eumori v. Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. with prejudice after the parties reported reaching an agreement on all issues.

Who this affects

Atelier Eumori and the five named defendants: Roadget Business Pte. Ltd., Shein Distribution Corporation, Shein US Services, LLC, Shein Technology LLC, and Fashion Choice Pte. Ltd.

What happened

In Atelier Eumori v. Roadget Business Pte. Ltd., the court was told that the parties had reached an agreement on all issues through the magistrate judge. The opinion does not describe the agreement’s terms.

The court cancelled all scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It also directed the Clerk to terminate all open motions and close the case.

Judge Valerie Caproni dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The parties may ask to reopen the case within 30 days by showing good cause, and they may ask the court to retain authority to enforce their agreement by submitting the agreement and a separate request within that period.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Eumori v. Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. · No. 1:24-cv-03531
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
July 7, 2025

Background

On June 26, 2025, the court was notified that the parties had reached an agreement on all issues through the magistrate judge. The order does not state the terms of that agreement.

Court’s Action

The court cancelled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.

Reopening and Enforcement

The parties may apply to reopen the case within 30 days of the order. Any application must show good cause for keeping the case open in light of the settlement, and an application filed after 30 days or without that showing may be denied on that basis. If the parties want the court to retain jurisdiction—the authority to enforce the settlement agreement—they must submit the agreement and request an order expressly retaining jurisdiction within the same 30-day period.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.