Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 8, 2025

Martinez Casique v. Armendariz

Judge
Garnett
Docket
1:23-cv-07592
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
EmploymentFlsaFee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

Martinez Casique v. Armendariz: Judge Garnett approved the FLSA settlement, including $200,000 in fees, and dismissed the case with prejudice.

Who this affects

The settlement approval affects the plaintiffs and defendants in this Fair Labor Standards Act, New York Labor Law, and New York City Human Rights Law action, including the plaintiffs’ recovery and attorneys’ fees.

What happened

In Martinez Casique v. Armendariz, the parties resolved claims brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act, New York wage laws, and the New York City Human Rights Law. They asked the court to approve their settlement.

The court found the $600,000 settlement fair and reasonable in light of the claims, litigation risks, and potential costs. It also approved $200,000 in attorneys’ fees and costs, equal to one-third of the settlement amount.

Judge Margaret M. Garnett approved the settlement on the condition that any changes receive court approval. She dismissed the case with prejudice and directed the clerk to close it.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Martinez Casique v. Armendariz · No. 1:23-cv-07592
Judge
Garnett
Date
July 8, 2025

Background

The plaintiffs brought this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, New York Labor Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law. The parties advised the court that they had reached a settlement in principle. The court then directed them to submit the settlement agreement and a memorandum explaining why the settlement was fair, using factors identified in prior Southern District of New York decisions.

Settlement and Attorneys’ Fees

After reviewing the parties’ submission, the court found the settlement fair and reasonable, considering the nature and scope of the plaintiffs’ claims and the risks and expenses of further litigation. The settlement amount was $600,000. The plaintiffs requested $200,000 in attorneys’ fees and costs, which represented 33.33% of the settlement. The court concluded that this amount was appropriate in light of fees commonly approved in similar Fair Labor Standards Act settlements and the amount remaining for the plaintiffs.

Ruling

Judge Margaret M. Garnett approved the settlement agreement. The approval was conditioned on court approval of any modification to the agreement, even if the agreement stated that the parties could modify it without court approval. The court dismissed the case with prejudice, directed the clerk to terminate the settlement-approval motion, and ordered the case closed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.