Philip M. v. Daisy Floral Services Corp
- Philip Halpern
- 7:24-cv-04418
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Darnell M. v. Daisy Floral Services Corp., Judge Halpern granted a one-week extension to file a settlement-approval motion.
The parties in Darnell Mobley v. Daisy Floral Services Corp., et al., including the defendants represented by the requesting counsel, received an extension from July 10 to July 17, 2025, to file a joint settlement-approval motion.
What happened
In Darnell M. v. Daisy Floral Services Corp., the parties asked for a one-week extension of their deadline to file a joint motion seeking court approval of their settlement. The deadline was July 10, 2025.
The parties said they had finalized and begun signing the settlement agreement, but one defendant was unavailable to review and sign it. They requested a new deadline of July 17, 2025, and stated that this was their second extension request.
Judge Philip M. Halpern granted the request and directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the letter motion pending at Doc. 33.
The detailed version
- Philip M. v. Daisy Floral Services Corp · No. 7:24-cv-04418
- Philip Halpern
- July 9, 2025
Background
Counsel for the defendants requested a one-week extension of the parties’ deadline to file a joint motion for court approval of their settlement. The request concerned approval under the procedure discussed in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. The existing deadline was Thursday, July 10, 2025.
The parties stated that they had finalized and begun executing the settlement agreement. They explained that one defendant was unavailable to review and execute the agreement, and they requested an extension until Thursday, July 17, 2025. The letter stated that this was the parties’ second request for an extension.
Ruling
Judge Philip M. Halpern granted the application. The court also directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the letter motion pending at Doc. 33. The opinion does not state that the court approved the settlement itself.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.