Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 4, 2025

Batson v. Kellogg

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
7:25-cv-04270
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedureDiscoveryPro Se
In one sentence

In Batson v. Kellogg, Judge Karas ordered service of the complaint and discovery responses but did not decide Batson’s constitutional or state-law claims.

Who this affects

David Batson, who is proceeding without a lawyer, will receive assistance with serving the complaint. Correction Officer Gary Kellogg must respond to the specified discovery requests within the time ordered after being served.

What happened

David Batson, who is held at the Westchester County Jail and is representing himself, sued Correction Officer Gary Kellogg for alleged federal constitutional and state-law violations and seeks damages. The court had previously allowed Batson to proceed without prepaying filing fees.

The court directed the Clerk to issue a summons, prepare service paperwork, and send the necessary documents to the United States Marshals Service so Kellogg can be served. The court also extended the service period to 90 days after the summons is issued and instructed Batson to notify the court if his address changes.

Judge Kenneth M. Karas also ordered Kellogg to answer specified prisoner-discovery requests under Local Civil Rule 33.2 within 120 days after receiving the summons and complaint. The order did not decide whether Batson’s claims are valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Batson v. Kellogg · No. 7:25-cv-04270
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Aug. 4, 2025

Background

David Batson, who is currently held at the Westchester County Jail, filed this action without a lawyer against Westchester County Jail Correction Officer Gary Kellogg, identified in the caption as Officer Gary Kellogg, OFC #2059. Batson seeks damages and asserts federal constitutional and other claims. The court construed the complaint as asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal civil-rights statute, and New York state law.

The court had previously granted Batson permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees. Because Batson is proceeding under that permission, the court explained that he may rely on the court and the United States Marshals Service to serve Kellogg.

Court’s Orders

The court directed the Clerk of Court to issue a summons for Kellogg, complete a United States Marshals Service process form, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to serve the summons and complaint. The court stated that service must occur within 90 days after the summons is issued. If service does not occur within that period, Batson should request an extension of time. The court also stated that Batson must notify the court in writing if his address changes and that the action may be dismissed if he fails to do so.

The court determined that Local Civil Rule 33.2 applies. That rule requires certain defendants in prisoner actions to respond to specified court-ordered discovery requests. The court directed Kellogg to serve responses to those requests within 120 days after service of the summons and complaint, and to quote each request verbatim in his responses. The court also directed the Clerk to mail Batson an information package.

Disposition and Scope

This was an order concerning service of process and discovery procedures. The court did not decide the merits of Batson’s constitutional or state-law claims and did not rule on whether Kellogg violated any law.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.