Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Sept. 15, 2025

Transamerica Ship Holdings v. Control

Full caption

Transamerica Ship Holdings, Ltd. and U.S. Shipbrokers, LLC v. Marine Control, Inc., Larry Singh and Surety Unlimited Services, Inc.

Judge
Vargas
Docket
1:25-cv-02827
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
6
ArbitrationContractSummary Judgment
In one sentence

In Transamerica Ship Holdings v. Marine Control, Judge Vargas confirmed the arbitration award and entered judgment for the petitioners.

Who this affects

Transamerica Ship Holdings, Ltd. and U.S. Shipbrokers, LLC obtained confirmation of the arbitration award and a judgment requiring Marine Control, Inc., Larry Singh, and Surety Unlimited Services, Inc. to pay the amounts specified in the judgment. Singh and Marine Control were jointly and severally liable for the first award; Singh and Surety Unlimited Services, Inc. were jointly and severally liable for the second; and all respondents were jointly and severally liable for the arbitration fees and court costs.

What happened

Transamerica Ship Holdings, Ltd. and U.S. Shipbrokers, LLC asked the court to confirm an arbitration award against Marine Control, Inc., Larry Singh, and Surety Unlimited Services, Inc. The respondents did not oppose the petition or seek other relief from the award.

The dispute arose from respondents’ failure to pay $325,000 under two promissory notes for the purchase of a passenger cruise vessel. After a hearing, the arbitration panel ruled for the petitioners and awarded money, interest, and arbitration fees.

Judge Jeannette A. Vargas granted the petition, confirmed the award in all respects, entered judgment for the petitioners, awarded specified amounts and costs against the respondents, and awarded interest after judgment at the statutory rate.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Transamerica Ship Holdings v. Control · No. 1:25-cv-02827
Judge
Vargas
Date
Sept. 15, 2025

Background

Transamerica Ship Holdings, Ltd. and U.S. Shipbrokers, LLC petitioned the court to confirm a March 24, 2025 arbitration award. The petition arose from an Agreement of Purchase Sale under which the respondents were to purchase the passenger cruise vessel M/V BERAKAH. The petitioners said the respondents failed to pay $325,000 required by two promissory notes.

The parties submitted claims, defenses, and supporting documents in the arbitration, and an evidentiary hearing took place in New York on November 14, 2024. The respondents argued that the vessel’s condition had deteriorated enough to justify not paying the notes, but the arbitration panel rejected that position and ruled for the petitioners.

Applicable standard

The court applied Chapter 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act, which implements the New York Convention on recognition and enforcement of international arbitration awards. Under that law, a court must confirm an award unless one of seven specified grounds for refusing recognition or enforcement applies. The party opposing enforcement bears the burden of proving such a ground.

Although the respondents did not respond to the petition, the court explained that it could not grant the petition solely because it was unopposed. It had to examine the petitioners’ submissions and determine whether they showed that no material factual dispute prevented judgment. The court found that the arbitration decision provided more than the minimal justification required for confirmation and found no indication that any of the seven refusal grounds applied.

Court’s ruling

The court granted the petition, confirmed the March 24, 2025 arbitration award in all respects, and entered judgment for the petitioners against the respondents. The judgment ordered:

- $125,000, plus $18,696.60 in prejudgment interest at 7% annually, for a total of $143,696.60, jointly and severally against Larry Singh and Marine Control, Inc.; - $200,000, plus $58,108.33 in prejudgment interest at 7% annually, for a total of $258,108.33, jointly and severally against Larry Singh and Surety Unlimited Services, Inc.; - $15,000 in arbitration fees and $160.40 in costs from the court proceeding, jointly and severally against all respondents; and - Post-judgment interest at the statutory rate until payment.

Judge Jeannette A. Vargas also stated that the court affirmed post-award prejudgment interest at the 7% and 15% annual rates provided in the two promissory notes, respectively, through the date of judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 6-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.