Seaman v. National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-2
Katherine Seaman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, et al. v. National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-2, et al.
- Paul Gardephe
- 1:18-cv-01781
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 5
In Seaman v. National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-2, Judge Moses ordered plaintiffs to reimburse an expert $6,099.95 after reducing his requested hourly rate.
The plaintiffs must reimburse the Trust Defendants $6,099.95 for Roger Saylor’s deposition-related expert time and local travel expenses.
What happened
In Katherine Seaman v. National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-2, the defendants asked the court to require the plaintiffs to pay expert witness Roger Saylor for preparing for and participating in his deposition. The plaintiffs argued that the request was premature because they had asked to exclude Saylor’s testimony, that the defendants had not properly discussed the issue with them beforehand, and that the bill was too high.
The court rejected the arguments that the request was premature and that the defendants had violated the discussion requirement for discovery motions. It ruled that a pending request to exclude an expert’s testimony did not eliminate the obligation to pay a reasonable fee for the expert’s deposition-related time. The court agreed, however, that the requested $500 hourly rate was excessive.
Judge Barbara Moses granted the motion to the extent stated in the order and required the plaintiffs to reimburse the defendants $6,099.95 within 30 days. That amount covered 16 hours at $375 per hour—eight hours of preparation and eight hours of deposition testimony—plus $99.95 in local travel expenses.
The detailed version
- Seaman v. National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-2 · No. 1:18-cv-01781
- Paul Gardephe
- Sept. 18, 2025
Background
The Trust Defendants asked the court to require the plaintiffs to reimburse their expert witness, Roger Saylor, for reasonable time and expenses connected with his February 28, 2025 deposition. The request sought $8,099.05: 16 hours at $500 per hour, consisting of eight hours preparing for the deposition and eight hours testifying, plus $99.95 in local travel expenses.
The parties’ arguments
The plaintiffs opposed the request on three grounds. First, they argued that reimbursement should wait because they had filed a motion under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals asking the court to exclude Saylor’s testimony. Second, they argued that the Trust Defendants had not met and conferred with plaintiffs’ counsel before filing the motion. Third, they challenged the amount of the bill, including Saylor’s hourly rate.
Court’s analysis
The court concluded that the pending Daubert motion did not eliminate or postpone the plaintiffs’ obligation under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4) to pay an identified expert a reasonable fee for time spent responding to discovery. The court also found that the Trust Defendants had not violated the court’s meet-and-confer requirement. Instead, the court concluded that the plaintiffs had not responded promptly and in good faith to the defendants’ reimbursement requests.
The court agreed with the plaintiffs that the requested $500 hourly rate was excessive. It declined to reduce the rate merely because Saylor lives in North Carolina or because he had not worked in securitization for nearly 20 years. The defendants had retained him to testify about how the student loans at issue were securitized two decades earlier. Because neither side provided evidence of the reasonable rate for an expert with Saylor’s qualifications, the court set the rate at $375 per hour, using a blended rate the court had previously approved for plaintiffs’ attorneys in a discovery-sanctions award. The court rejected the plaintiffs’ remaining objections.
Disposition
Judge Barbara Moses ordered the plaintiffs, within 30 days, to reimburse the Trust Defendants $6,099.95. The award covered eight hours of preparation and eight hours of deposition testimony at $375 per hour, plus $99.95 in local travel expenses. The Trust Defendants’ letter-motion was granted to that extent, and the Clerk of Court was directed to close the motion.
Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.