Collado v. United States District Court
- Valerie Caproni
- 1:21-cv-05197
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Collado v. United States District Court, Judge Caproni denied the petition and closed the case after adopting the report and recommendation.
The petitioner and the opposing party in Jaifa Collado v. United States District Court. The reproduced caption does not clearly identify the petitioner’s name or the parties’ roles.
What happened
In Jaifa Collado v. United States District Court, the court adopted a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation in full. The excerpt does not explain what the petition challenged or why the report recommended denial.
The parties did not object to the report and recommendation, even though it warned them about the consequences of not objecting. The court stated that this failure prevents further appeal-related review of the decision.
Judge Valerie Caproni’s court denied the petition and closed the case. The judgment relies on the court’s October 30, 2025 order for the reasons supporting that result.
The detailed version
- Collado v. United States District Court · No. 1:21-cv-05197
- Valerie Caproni
- Oct. 31, 2025
Decision
The court adopted the report and recommendation in full and denied the petition. It also stated that the case was closed.
Reasoning Described in the Judgment
The judgment says that the reasons for denying the petition appear in the court’s October 30, 2025 order. That order is not included in the provided text, so the petition’s subject and the court’s substantive reasoning cannot be determined from this judgment alone.
The court also stated that the report and recommendation gave the parties adequate warning about the consequences of failing to object. Because no party filed objections, the court said that appellate review of the decision was waived under the cited Second Circuit precedent.
Disposition
Judge Valerie Caproni’s court adopted the report and recommendation in full, denied the petition, and closed the case. The judgment does not state whether the denial was with or without prejudice.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.