Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled May 5, 2021

Bussie v. Yellen

Judge
Kandis Westmore
Docket
4:21-cv-03054
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Bussie v. Yellen, Judge Westmore transferred a custody challenge to North Carolina because habeas jurisdiction belongs where the person is confined.

Who this affects

Anthony Bussie and the pending case were affected: the court transferred the case to the Eastern District of North Carolina and terminated any pending motions.

What happened

In Bussie v. Yellen, Anthony Bussie, a civil detainee at a federal medical center in North Carolina, filed a petition challenging his custody and seeking release. The opinion also says he appeared to challenge rulings in a separate class action.

The court explained that federal law generally places jurisdiction over a petition challenging physical confinement in the district where the person is confined. Because Bussie was held in the Eastern District of North Carolina, the Northern District of California decided that the case belonged there.

The court ordered the case transferred to the Eastern District of North Carolina and directed the clerk to terminate any pending motions. Judge Kandis Westmore issued the order on May 5, 2021.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bussie v. Yellen · No. 4:21-cv-03054
Judge
Kandis Westmore
Date
May 5, 2021

Background

Anthony Bussie, identified as a civil detainee housed at the Federal Medical Center in Butner, North Carolina, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The opinion says the petition is difficult to understand, but appears to seek release from custody and to challenge rulings in the prisoner class action Scholl v. Mnuchin, Case Number C 20-5309 (PJH) (N.D. Cal.). The opinion also states that Bussie was convicted and sentenced in the Eastern District of North Carolina, where the medical center is located.

Jurisdiction and Transfer

The court explained that § 2241 authorizes federal courts to issue release orders within their respective jurisdictions. Citing Supreme Court precedent, the court stated that for petitions challenging physical confinement, jurisdiction lies only in the district of confinement. Because Bussie was challenging his physical confinement and was housed in the Eastern District of North Carolina, the court concluded that the case had to be transferred there.

Disposition

The court ordered transfer of the case to the Eastern District of North Carolina. It also directed the clerk to terminate any pending motions. The opinion separately states that, to the extent Bussie was challenging rulings in the Scholl litigation, he could file a letter, but the provided text ends before explaining where or how that letter should be filed. Judge Kandis Westmore signed the order on May 5, 2021.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.