Bussie v. Yellen
- Kandis Westmore
- 4:21-cv-03054
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 2
In Bussie v. Yellen, Judge Westmore transferred a custody challenge to North Carolina because habeas jurisdiction belongs where the person is confined.
Anthony Bussie and the pending case were affected: the court transferred the case to the Eastern District of North Carolina and terminated any pending motions.
What happened
In Bussie v. Yellen, Anthony Bussie, a civil detainee at a federal medical center in North Carolina, filed a petition challenging his custody and seeking release. The opinion also says he appeared to challenge rulings in a separate class action.
The court explained that federal law generally places jurisdiction over a petition challenging physical confinement in the district where the person is confined. Because Bussie was held in the Eastern District of North Carolina, the Northern District of California decided that the case belonged there.
The court ordered the case transferred to the Eastern District of North Carolina and directed the clerk to terminate any pending motions. Judge Kandis Westmore issued the order on May 5, 2021.
The detailed version
- Bussie v. Yellen · No. 4:21-cv-03054
- Kandis Westmore
- May 5, 2021
Background
Anthony Bussie, identified as a civil detainee housed at the Federal Medical Center in Butner, North Carolina, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The opinion says the petition is difficult to understand, but appears to seek release from custody and to challenge rulings in the prisoner class action Scholl v. Mnuchin, Case Number C 20-5309 (PJH) (N.D. Cal.). The opinion also states that Bussie was convicted and sentenced in the Eastern District of North Carolina, where the medical center is located.
Jurisdiction and Transfer
The court explained that § 2241 authorizes federal courts to issue release orders within their respective jurisdictions. Citing Supreme Court precedent, the court stated that for petitions challenging physical confinement, jurisdiction lies only in the district of confinement. Because Bussie was challenging his physical confinement and was housed in the Eastern District of North Carolina, the court concluded that the case had to be transferred there.
Disposition
The court ordered transfer of the case to the Eastern District of North Carolina. It also directed the clerk to terminate any pending motions. The opinion separately states that, to the extent Bussie was challenging rulings in the Scholl litigation, he could file a letter, but the provided text ends before explaining where or how that letter should be filed. Judge Kandis Westmore signed the order on May 5, 2021.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.