Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 27, 2023

Lupercio v. Attorney

Judge
Jon Tigar
Docket
4:23-cv-01452
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureCivil RightsPro Se
In one sentence

In Ramon Lupercio Navarro v. Attorney, Judge Peterson transferred the civil-rights case to the Northern District of California because it was filed in the wrong district.

Who this affects

Ramon Lupercio Navarro and the defendants named in his civil-rights action; the Northern District of California will handle the transferred case.

What happened

Ramon Lupercio Navarro, a state prisoner without a lawyer, filed a civil-rights lawsuit under a federal law known as Section 1983. The complaint appeared to challenge the legitimacy of his conviction, which the court said might require a different type of case challenging imprisonment.

The case was filed in the Eastern District of California, but Navarro was imprisoned at San Quentin State Prison in Marin County. The court said Marin County is in the Northern District of California and that the case should have been filed there.

The court transferred the case to the Northern District of California in the interest of justice. Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson issued the transfer order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lupercio v. Attorney · No. 4:23-cv-01452
Judge
Jon Tigar
Date
Mar. 27, 2023

Background

Ramon Lupercio Navarro, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, filed a civil-rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The opinion says his complaint appeared to attack the legitimacy of his conviction and that he might need to pursue those claims through a petition challenging his imprisonment instead.

Venue

Navarro was imprisoned at San Quentin State Prison, which the opinion says is located in Marin County. Marin County is in the Northern District of California. The court concluded that the action should have been filed there rather than in the Eastern District of California.

Ruling

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), a federal court may transfer a case filed in the wrong district when doing so serves the interests of justice. The court ordered that the matter be transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The order was signed by United States Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson.

Terminology

A transfer changes which federal district court handles the case; the opinion does not decide whether Navarro's claims are legally valid.

Record discrepancy

The supplied metadata identifies the court as the Northern District of California and the judge as Jon Tigar, but the opinion text identifies the issuing court as the Eastern District of California and the signing judge as Jeremy D. Peterson. This summary follows the opinion text.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.