Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 2, 2024

Mackey v. Bloomfield

Judge
Jacquelyn Corley
Docket
3:22-cv-05105
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
Civil RightsCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Mackey v. Sgt. Baker, Judge Corley denied Mackey’s request for appointed counsel in his civil-rights case.

Who this affects

Vincent Robert Mackey’s request for appointed counsel was denied; the underlying civil-rights case was not resolved by this order.

What happened

Vincent Robert Mackey asked the court to appoint a lawyer to represent him in this civil-rights case against Sgt. Baker and other defendants.

The court explained that civil litigants generally have no right to appointed counsel. It found no exceptional circumstances: the issues were not sufficiently complex, and Mackey appeared able to present his claims effectively. The court denied the motion.

Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley said the court could refer the case for pro bono counsel later if necessary, but ordered Mackey not to request appointment of counsel in that court again.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mackey v. Bloomfield · No. 3:22-cv-05105
Judge
Jacquelyn Corley
Date
Jan. 2, 2024

Background

Vincent Robert Mackey moved for appointment of a lawyer to represent him in this civil-rights case. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.

Legal standard

The court stated that there is no general right to counsel in a civil case. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, a court may request counsel for an indigent litigant only in “exceptional circumstances.” The decision is left to the trial court’s discretion.

Ruling

The court found no exceptional circumstances, and none appeared to be present. At this stage, the issues were not sufficiently complex, and Mackey was not shown to be unable to present his claims effectively. The court therefore denied Mackey’s motion for appointment of counsel.

The court stated that if referral to locate pro bono counsel became necessary later, it would issue a referral order on its own. It also ordered Mackey not to request appointment of counsel in that court again.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.