Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 1, 2024

Abraham v. Cates

Judge
Pitts
Docket
5:23-cv-03587
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Abraham v. Cates, Judge Pitts transferred Abraham’s state-prison petition to the Central District of California because it challenges an Orange County conviction.

Who this affects

Alec Scott Abraham’s federal challenge to his Orange County conviction was transferred from the Northern District of California to the Central District of California. The order also terminated all pending motions and transferred the case file.

What happened

Alec Scott Abraham filed a petition challenging his conviction from the Orange County Superior Court. He filed it under the federal law that allows state prisoners to challenge convictions in federal court.

The Northern District of California explained that such a petition may be heard where the prisoner is confined or where the conviction occurred. Because Abraham’s conviction came from Orange County, the court transferred the case to the Central District of California, the district that includes Orange County.

Judge P. Casey Pitts ordered the transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). The clerk was directed to terminate all pending motions and send the entire case file to the Central District of California.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Abraham v. Cates · No. 5:23-cv-03587
Judge
Pitts
Date
Mar. 1, 2024

Background

Alec Scott Abraham, identified as a state prisoner at California Correctional Institution, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The petition challenges a conviction from the Orange County Superior Court.

Venue

The court stated that venue for a state-prison habeas petition is proper either in the district where the prisoner is confined or in the district where the prisoner was convicted. It also stated that petitions challenging a conviction or sentence are preferably heard in the district of conviction. Because the challenged conviction was from Orange County, the Central District of California is the district of conviction.

Ruling

The court transferred the case to the United States District Court for the Central District of California under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). The clerk was ordered to terminate all pending motions and transfer the entire file. The order did not decide the merits of Abraham’s challenge to his conviction.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.