Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 22, 2024

Randle v. Contra Costa County Sheriff's Department

Judge
Jacquelyn Corley
Docket
3:23-cv-05456
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
Civil RightsCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Randle v. Contra Costa County Sheriff’s Department, Judge Corley dismissed the case with prejudice after Randle failed to amend his civil-rights complaint.

Who this affects

Ramello Randle's civil-rights case was dismissed with prejudice after he did not file the amended complaint the court had authorized.

What happened

Randle v. Contra Costa County Sheriff’s Department involved a civil-rights complaint that the court had dismissed on February 6, 2024, because it did not present a claim the law could recognize.

The court gave Randle 28 days to file an amended complaint and warned that the case would be dismissed if he did not do so. Randle did not file an amended complaint, request more time, or explain why he had not done so.

Judge Jacquelyn Corley dismissed the case with prejudice, directed the Clerk to enter judgment, and closed the file.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Randle v. Contra Costa County Sheriff's Department · No. 3:23-cv-05456
Judge
Jacquelyn Corley
Date
Apr. 22, 2024

Background

Ramello Randle brought a civil-rights complaint against the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Department and other defendants. On February 6, 2024, the court dismissed the complaint for failure to present a claim for relief that the court could recognize. The court allowed Randle 28 days to file an amended complaint and warned that the case would be dismissed if he did not do so.

What Happened Next

Randle did not file an amended complaint, request an extension of time, or show cause—provide a reason—to explain why he had not amended the complaint.

Ruling

Judge Jacquelyn Scott Corley dismissed the case with prejudice. The court also directed the Clerk to enter judgment and close the file.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.