Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 4, 2018

Amen El v. Roy

Judge
Donovan Frank
Docket
0:17-cv-02790
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
2
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Amen El v. Roy, Judge Frank granted appeal fee-waiver status, denied reconsideration, and ordered the petitioner’s name changed in court records.

Who this affects

Pharaoh El-Forever Left-i Amen El, whose application to appeal without paying court fees was granted, whose reconsideration request was denied, and whose name was ordered changed in the court’s records.

What happened

Amen El v. Roy concerns Pharaoh El-Forever Left-i Amen El’s request to appeal after the court denied his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, meaning a petition challenging the legality of his custody or detention. He asked to appeal without paying court fees and also asked to file a reconsideration motion.

The court found that Amen El qualified financially to appeal without paying the fees. It also found that his appeal was not frivolous, even though the court had declined to issue a certificate allowing the appeal and continued to believe the petition had been properly denied.

Judge Donovan Frank granted the request to proceed without paying the appeal fees, denied the reconsideration request, and directed the clerk to change the petitioner’s name to Pharaoh El-Forever Left-i Amen El.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Amen El v. Roy · No. 0:17-cv-02790
Judge
Donovan Frank
Date
Oct. 4, 2018

Background

Pharaoh El-Forever Left-i Amen El, formerly also identified in the caption as Pharaoh El-Forever Amen El and DeSean Lamont Thomas, had filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The court had denied that petition. He then sought to appeal and applied to proceed in forma pauperis, which means without paying the required court fees because of limited financial resources. He also submitted a self-styled letter or motion asking for reconsideration.

Court’s analysis

The court concluded that Amen El qualified financially for in forma pauperis status. It explained that the standard for proceeding without paying fees is lower than the standard for receiving a certificate of appealability. Although the court had declined to issue a certificate of appealability and continued to believe that the habeas petition was properly denied, it found that the appeal was not frivolous under the applicable Supreme Court standard.

Rulings

The court granted Amen El’s application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. It denied his letter or motion for reconsideration. The court also directed the clerk’s office to change the petitioner’s name to Pharaoh El-Forever Left-i Amen El, consistent with an amended name-change order issued by Chisago County Judge Suzanne Bollman.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.