Kelly T. v. Kijakazi
- Wilhelmina Wright
- 0:20-cv-01915
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 1
In Kelly T. v. Kijakazi, Judge Wright denied Kelly T.’s summary-judgment motion and granted Kijakazi’s.
Kelly T. and Kilolo Kijakazi; the court denied Kelly T.’s motion for summary judgment and granted Kilolo Kijakazi’s motion.
What happened
Kelly T. v. Kijakazi concerns competing requests for summary judgment, but this order does not describe the underlying Social Security dispute.
The court adopted the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation after finding no clear error because neither side objected. It denied Kelly T.’s motion for summary judgment and granted Kilolo Kijakazi’s motion.
Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright ordered judgment to be entered accordingly.
The detailed version
- Kelly T. v. Kijakazi · No. 0:20-cv-01915
- Wilhelmina Wright
- Feb. 18, 2022
Background
The court considered a January 26, 2022 report and recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. The opinion does not explain the underlying Social Security claims or the parties’ arguments. No objections to the report and recommendation were filed.
Court’s Analysis
When no timely objection is filed, the court reviews a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation for clear error. Judge Wright reviewed the report and found no clear error.
Ruling
The court adopted the report and recommendation. It denied Kelly T.’s motion for summary judgment and granted Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi’s motion for summary judgment. The court ordered judgment to be entered accordingly.
Note on the Record
The order refers once to the defendant as “Kilo Kijakazi,” while the caption identifies the defendant as “Kilolo Kijakazi.” The opinion does not provide the reasoning or underlying merits discussed in the adopted report and recommendation.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.