Wendy J. B. v. Kijakazi
- Eric Tostrud
- 0:21-cv-00238
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 1
In Wendy J. B.-I. v. Kijakazi, Judge Tostrud denied Wendy’s motion, granted Kijakazi’s motion, and affirmed the Social Security decision.
Wendy J. B.-I. and the Social Security Administration, through its Acting Commissioner, Kilolo Kijakazi.
What happened
In Wendy J. B.-I. v. Kijakazi, the court reviewed a Social Security Administration decision. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute or the parties’ arguments.
The court accepted a magistrate judge’s recommendation after finding no clear error because no party objected. It denied Wendy J. B.-I.’s motion for summary judgment, granted the Acting Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment, and affirmed the Social Security Administration’s decision.
Judge Eric C. Tostrud issued the order on May 5, 2022, and directed that judgment be entered.
The detailed version
- Wendy J. B. v. Kijakazi · No. 0:21-cv-00238
- Eric Tostrud
- May 5, 2022
Background
Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty issued a Report and Recommendation on April 19, 2022. No party objected. The district court therefore reviewed the recommendation for clear error. The opinion does not provide the underlying facts, the parties’ arguments, or the specific issue presented in the Social Security dispute.
Rulings
Judge Eric C. Tostrud found no clear error and accepted the Report and Recommendation. The court:
- denied Plaintiff Wendy J. B.-I.’s motion for summary judgment; - granted Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi’s motion for summary judgment; and - affirmed the Social Security Administration’s decision.
The court also ordered that judgment be entered accordingly.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.