Steven S. v. Kijakazi
- Wilhelmina Wright
- 0:21-cv-01201
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 1
In Steven S. v. Kijakazi, Judge Wright adopted the recommendation, denied Steven S.’s summary-judgment motion, and granted Kijakazi’s.
Steven S.’s motion for summary judgment was denied, and Kilolo Kijakazi’s motion for summary judgment was granted.
What happened
In Steven S. v. Kijakazi, the court reviewed a magistrate judge’s recommendation concerning both sides’ motions for summary judgment. The provided opinion does not describe the underlying dispute or the legal issues involved.
No party objected to the recommendation. Because there were no timely objections, the court reviewed it for clear error and found none.
Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright adopted the recommendation, denied Steven S.’s motion for summary judgment, granted Kilolo Kijakazi’s motion for summary judgment, and directed that judgment be entered.
The detailed version
- Steven S. v. Kijakazi · No. 0:21-cv-01201
- Wilhelmina Wright
- July 26, 2022
Background
The court considered a June 6, 2022 Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. The recommendation addressed Steven S.’s motion for summary judgment and Kilolo Kijakazi’s motion for summary judgment. The provided order does not state the underlying facts, claims, or legal reasoning in the recommendation.
Review of the Recommendation
Neither party filed objections. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the court therefore reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake in the magistrate judge’s analysis or decision. The court found no clear error.
Ruling
The court adopted the June 6, 2022 Report and Recommendation. It denied Steven S.’s motion for summary judgment and granted Kilolo Kijakazi’s motion for summary judgment. The court directed that judgment be entered accordingly.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.