Jill S. v. Kijakazi
- Eric Tostrud
- 0:22-cv-02168
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 1
In Jill S. v. Kijakazi, Judge Tostrud affirmed the Social Security decision, denied Jill S.’s relief request, granted Kijakazi’s summary-judgment motion, and dismissed the complaint with prejudice.
Jill S.’s Social Security case was resolved against her; the Commissioner’s decision was affirmed, and the complaint was dismissed with prejudice.
What happened
Jill S. v. Kijakazi involved Jill S.’s challenge to the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute in detail.
No party objected to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. The court reviewed it for clear error, found none, and accepted it.
Judge Tostrud denied Jill S.’s request for relief, granted the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment, affirmed the Commissioner’s decision, and dismissed the complaint with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Jill S. v. Kijakazi · No. 0:22-cv-02168
- Eric Tostrud
- Nov. 28, 2023
Background
Jill S. brought this Social Security case against Kilolo Kijakazi, the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. The opinion does not provide details about the underlying benefits dispute or the specific relief Jill S. requested.
Report and Recommendation
Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster issued a Report and Recommendation on November 2, 2023. No party objected. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the district court therefore reviewed the recommendation for clear error. The court found no clear error and accepted the recommendation.
Ruling
The court denied Jill S.’s request for relief, granted the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment, and affirmed the Commissioner’s decision. It also dismissed Jill S.’s complaint with prejudice and directed that judgment be entered.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.