Jackson v. Schnell
- Katherine Menendez
- 0:23-cv-03827
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 2
In Jackson v. Schnell, Judge Menendez accepted the recommendation and denied Jackson’s motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction.
Tony Dejuan Jackson’s request for immediate court relief was denied; the order also affected defendants Paul Schnell, Jo Ann Erickson, and William Bolin.
What happened
In Jackson v. Schnell, Tony Dejuan Jackson asked for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against Paul Schnell, Jo Ann Erickson, and William Bolin.
The opinion does not repeat the factual background described in the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. Jackson did not object before the deadline passed.
Judge Katherine Menendez reviewed the report for clear error, found none, accepted it, and denied Jackson’s motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction.
The detailed version
- Jackson v. Schnell · No. 0:23-cv-03827
- Katherine Menendez
- May 6, 2024
Background
Plaintiff Tony Dejuan Jackson moved for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko issued a report and recommendation dated March 26, 2024, recommending that the motion be denied. The order states that the report describes the relevant factual background, but it does not repeat that background.
Review of the Report and Recommendation
Jackson did not object to the report and recommendation, and the deadline for objections had passed. Because there were no objections, the court reviewed the report for clear error rather than conducting a new review of the disputed issues. The court carefully reviewed the report and found no error.
Ruling
The court accepted the report and recommendation and denied Jackson’s motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.