Marin-Angel v. Segal
- Jeffrey Bryan
- 0:23-cv-03209
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 2
In Marin-Angel v. Segal, Judge Bryan adopted the report, denied Marin-Angel’s petition challenging custody as moot, and dismissed the matter without prejudice.
Juana Marin-Angel’s petition was denied as moot, and the matter was dismissed without prejudice; the opinion identifies Michael Segal as the respondent.
What happened
In Marin-Angel v. Segal, Juana Marin-Angel filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus against Michael Segal, identified as the warden. A magistrate judge recommended denying the petition as moot.
Marin-Angel did not object to that recommendation, and the deadline for objections passed. The court therefore reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.
Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan adopted the recommendation, denied Marin-Angel’s petition as moot, and dismissed the matter without prejudice. The order directed that judgment be entered.
The detailed version
- Marin-Angel v. Segal · No. 0:23-cv-03209
- Jeffrey M. Bryan
- May 24, 2024
Background
Juana Marin-Angel was the petitioner, and Michael Segal, identified in the caption as a warden, was the respondent. Marin-Angel filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The opinion does not explain the underlying custody issue or why the petition became moot.
Report and Recommendation
United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois issued a Report and Recommendation dated April 23, 2024. It recommended that Marin-Angel’s petition be denied as moot. Marin-Angel did not file objections, and the deadline for doing so had passed.
Court’s Review and Ruling
Because no timely objections were filed, the court reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error. Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan found no clear error and adopted the Report and Recommendation. The court denied Marin-Angel’s petition as moot and dismissed the matter without prejudice. The court also directed that judgment be entered.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.