Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 30, 2019

Cuevas v. Our Children First, Inc.

Judge
Stewart Aaron
Docket
1:19-cv-07322
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureFlsa
In one sentence

In Cuevas v. Our Children First, Inc., Judge Aaron granted the parties’ request for a three-day extension to file their proposed wage-settlement approval motion.

Who this affects

The plaintiff, Judith Cuevas, and the defendant, Our Children First, Inc., received additional time to file their joint settlement-approval motion.

What happened

In Cuevas v. Our Children First, Inc., the plaintiff’s lawyer requested more time to file a joint motion asking the court to approve a settlement of the plaintiff’s wage claims under federal and New York law. The parties had finalized the settlement but were waiting for the defendant to sign the agreement.

The lawyer requested an extension from November 29, 2019, to December 2, 2019. The letter stated that this was the parties’ second request for an extension.

Judge Stuart D. Aaron granted the request. The opinion does not decide whether the settlement should ultimately be approved.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cuevas v. Our Children First, Inc. · No. 1:19-cv-07322
Judge
Stewart Aaron
Date
Nov. 30, 2019

Background

The plaintiff’s counsel stated that the case involved alleged wage violations under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. Counsel asked for a three-day extension—from November 29, 2019, to December 2, 2019—to file the parties’ joint motion seeking court approval of the settlement of the plaintiff’s federal wage claims.

Counsel said the parties had finalized their settlement agreement and the motion for approval but were waiting for the defendant’s signed agreement. The letter also stated that this was the parties’ second extension request.

Ruling

The court granted the extension request. The endorsement states: “Request GRANTED. SO ORDERED.” The opinion does not rule on whether to approve the settlement itself.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.