Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 17, 2019

Finchum v. Fields

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:19-cv-11523
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasPro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Finchum v. Fields, Chief Judge McMahon ordered David Finchum to pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed without prepayment.

Who this affects

David Finchum, whose habeas case could be dismissed if he does not pay the $5 filing fee or submit the required application within 30 days.

What happened

In Finchum v. Fields, David Finchum filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus without paying the required $5 filing fee or submitting an application to proceed without prepaying fees.

The court gave Finchum 30 days to pay the fee or submit a signed application to proceed without prepayment. The court said no response from the respondent was required at that time and warned that the action would be dismissed if Finchum did not comply.

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon ordered the Clerk of Court to send Finchum the order and process the case if he complied. She also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Finchum v. Fields · No. 1:19-cv-11523
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Dec. 17, 2019

Background

David Finchum, representing himself, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus against Leroy Fields, identified as Superintendent of Fishkill Correctional Facility, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision. Finchum submitted the petition without the required $5 filing fee and without an application to proceed without prepaying fees.

Order

The court ordered Finchum, within 30 days of the order, to do one of two things: pay the $5 filing fee or complete and submit the attached application to proceed without prepayment of fees. The application had to include docket number 19-CV-11523 (CM). The court explained that, if it granted the application, Finchum could proceed without prepaying the filing fee.

The Clerk of Court was directed to assign the matter to Judge McMahon's docket, mail Finchum a copy of the order, and record service on the docket. No answer from Fields was required at that time. The court stated that the case would be processed under the Clerk's Office procedures if Finchum complied, and that the action would be dismissed if he failed to comply within the allowed period.

Appeal and disposition

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. This order addressed only the filing fee and fee-waiver requirement; it did not decide the substance of Finchum's habeas petition. Judge Colleen McMahon signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.