Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 10, 2020

Mejia Mendez v. Sweet Sam's Baking Company LLC

Judge
Stewart Aaron
Docket
1:18-cv-09910
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Mejia Mendez v. Sweet Sam’s Baking Company LLC, Judge Aaron approved the parties’ Fair Labor Standards Act settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and Sweet Sam’s Baking Company LLC and the other defendants were affected: the settlement was approved, and the action was dismissed with prejudice and without costs except as provided in the settlement agreement.

What happened

Mejia Mendez v. Sweet Sam’s Baking Company LLC involved claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal law governing certain employee pay and working conditions. The parties asked the court to approve their proposed settlement.

The court reviewed the settlement and found it fair and reasonable. It also found that the plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees were fair and reasonable. The opinion does not state the settlement’s specific terms.

Judge Aaron approved the settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice, meaning the case was closed and could not be brought again. The dismissal was without costs, except as provided in the settlement agreement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mejia Mendez v. Sweet Sam's Baking Company LLC · No. 1:18-cv-09910
Judge
Stewart Aaron
Date
Mar. 10, 2020

Background

The plaintiffs brought claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. On January 24, 2020, the parties consented to have United States Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron decide the matter under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). On March 9, 2020, the parties submitted a proposed settlement agreement.

Court’s Analysis

The court reviewed the proposed settlement under the standard requiring a Fair Labor Standards Act settlement to be fair and reasonable. The court found that the settlement met that standard. It also found that the plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees were fair and reasonable. The opinion does not provide the settlement’s terms or the amount of the attorneys’ fees.

Disposition

The court approved the settlement. It dismissed the action with prejudice and without costs, except as may be stated in the settlement agreement.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.