Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 9, 2020

Moultrie v. Kings County Hospital

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-02854
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil RightsSection 1983Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Moultrie v. Kings County Hospital, Judge McMahon transferred the civil-rights action to the Eastern District of New York because the alleged events occurred there.

Who this affects

Mukadien Moultrie and the defendants in his § 1983 action; the case was moved from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York.

What happened

In Moultrie v. Kings County Hospital, Mukadien Moultrie, who was incarcerated at Rikers Island and represented himself, sued doctors connected with Kings County Hospital. He alleged that they prescribed psychiatric medication after he told them he was allergic to it.

The court ruled that the Southern District of New York was not the proper federal district because Moultrie did not allege that any defendant lived there or that a substantial part of the events occurred there. The court said the claims arose in Kings County, which is in the Eastern District of New York.

Judge Colleen McMahon transferred the action to the Eastern District of New York under the federal venue law and closed the case in the Southern District. The court also said that the transferee court would decide whether Moultrie could proceed without prepaying fees, and denied fee-free status for any appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Moultrie v. Kings County Hospital · No. 1:20-cv-02854
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Apr. 9, 2020

Background

Mukadien Moultrie, who was incarcerated at Rikers Island and proceeded without a lawyer, brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleged that doctors employed in the psychiatric ward at Kings County Hospital prescribed him psychiatric medication after he told them that he was allergic to it.

Venue Analysis

The court applied 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), which identifies the federal districts where a civil action may be filed. The court found that Moultrie did not allege that any defendant resided in the Southern District of New York or that a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to his claims occurred there. The court determined that the claims arose in Kings County, which is in the Eastern District of New York.

Disposition

The court transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), the statute allowing transfer when venue is improper. The Clerk was directed to transfer the action, and the Southern District case was closed. The court stated that the Eastern District would decide whether Moultrie could proceed without prepaying fees. No summons was to issue from the Southern District. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. Judge Colleen McMahon did not decide the merits of Moultrie’s allegations in this transfer order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.