Hawley v. Mphasis Corporation
- Denise Cote
- 1:12-cv-00592
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Hawley v. Mphasis Corporation, Judge Cote discontinued the action without costs, allowing restoration by May 20, 2020, otherwise dismissal would be with prejudice.
Curt Hawley and Mphasis Corporation; the action could be restored only if an application was made by May 20, 2020.
What happened
In Hawley v. Mphasis Corporation, the plaintiff’s lawyer asked for 30 more days to submit an agreement ending the case or reopen it. The request was made on April 10, 2020.
Mphasis Corporation agreed to the extension. The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and allowed an application to restore the case by May 20, 2020.
Judge Cote ordered that no further extensions would be granted. If no application to restore the case was made by May 20, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Hawley v. Mphasis Corporation · No. 1:12-cv-00592
- Denise Cote
- Apr. 10, 2020
Background
Counsel for Curt Hawley asked the court for an additional 30 days to submit a stipulation of dismissal or reopen the action. Mphasis Corporation consented to the requested extension.
Ruling
Judge Denise Cote ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar, provided that an application to restore the action was made by May 20, 2020. The court further ordered that no additional extensions of that date would be granted. If no application to restore the action was made by May 20, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
What the Opinion Does Not Decide
The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or decide their merits.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.