Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 21, 2020

D'Attore v. LaManna

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:18-cv-07017
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasPro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In D’Attore v. LaManna, Judge Furman dismissed the custody-release petition as moot after D’Attore died.

Who this affects

D’Attore’s federal petition challenging his custody was dismissed as moot; the opinion also denied a certificate of appealability and permission to appeal without paying filing fees.

What happened

In D’Attore v. LaManna, Gaetano D’Attore, representing himself, filed a federal petition challenging his custody in New York prison after a 2010 conviction.

The court learned that D’Attore had died in custody on December 19, 2019, and that his custody status was listed as “discharged.” Because the court could no longer grant his requested release, it found the petition moot.

Judge Jesse M. Furman dismissed the petition as moot and dismissed the case. The court also declined to issue a certificate allowing an appeal and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
D'Attore v. LaManna · No. 1:18-cv-07017
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
Apr. 21, 2020

Background

Gaetano D’Attore, proceeding without a lawyer, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 seeking federal habeas corpus relief. A habeas corpus petition asks a federal court to review whether a person’s custody is lawful. D’Attore challenged his custody in New York State prison following his 2010 conviction in Bronx County Supreme Court. The respondent was Jamie LaManna, identified as superintendent of Green Haven Correctional Facility.

Reason for the ruling

The court learned from New York State corrections records that D’Attore had died in custody on December 19, 2019. Those records also listed his custody status as “discharged.” The court concluded that it could no longer grant D’Attore the relief he requested—release from custody. It therefore treated the petition as moot, meaning that no effective relief remained for the court to provide. The opinion did not decide whether D’Attore’s conviction or custody had violated the law.

Disposition

Judge Jesse M. Furman ordered that D’Attore’s petition be dismissed as moot because he was deceased, and that the case be dismissed. The court also ruled that a certificate of appealability would not issue because D’Attore had not made a substantial showing that a constitutional right had been denied. In addition, the court certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.