Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 13, 2020

Scott v. Pike County Correctional Facility

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-03645
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Scott v. Pike County Correctional Facility, Judge McMahon transferred Scott’s federal conviction petition to Pennsylvania without deciding its merits and denied a certificate of appealability.

Who this affects

Tonia Scott’s federal petition was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Middle District of Pennsylvania, where further decisions about the petition and fees were left to the transferee court.

What happened

Scott v. Pike County Correctional Facility concerns Tonia Scott’s petition challenging a conviction from Pike County, Pennsylvania. Scott filed the petition without a lawyer in the Southern District of New York under a federal law allowing challenges to state convictions.

The court noted that Pike County is in the Middle District of Pennsylvania, not the Southern District of New York. It therefore transferred the case to the Middle District of Pennsylvania and closed the New York case. The opinion did not decide whether Scott’s petition had merit or whether she could proceed without paying fees.

Judge Colleen McMahon also declined to issue a certificate of appealability, which is required for an appeal in this type of case, because Scott had not made the required showing of a constitutional-right violation. The court also denied fee-free status for any appeal, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Scott v. Pike County Correctional Facility · No. 1:20-cv-03645
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
May 13, 2020

Background

Tonia Scott filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, the federal procedure for challenging a state-court conviction, against Pike County Correctional Facility and other respondents. The opinion states that Scott proceeded without a lawyer and that the petition listed a Manhattan address, while challenging a conviction from Pike County, Pennsylvania.

Transfer

The court determined that Pike County is located in the Middle District of Pennsylvania. Under Local Rule 83.3 and 28 U.S.C. § 118(b), the court transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. The order directed the Clerk of Court to mail Scott a copy of the order, record service on the docket, and transfer the action. The court stated that the transferee court would decide whether Scott could proceed without paying fees. The opinion also states that Scott had not submitted an application to proceed without paying fees.

Disposition

The transfer order closed the case in the Southern District of New York; it did not decide the merits of Scott’s conviction challenge. The court certified that Scott had not made a substantial showing that a constitutional right had been denied and therefore stated that a certificate of appealability would not issue. The court also denied fee-free status for an appeal, finding that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. Judge Colleen McMahon issued the order on May 13, 2020.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.