Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 27, 2020

Chevrestt v. Barstool Sports, Inc.

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:20-cv-01949
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Chevrestt v. Barstool Sports, Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice and closed it.

Who this affects

Angel Chevrestt and Barstool Sports, Inc.; the order ended their case based on their reported settlement.

What happened

In Chevrestt v. Barstool Sports, Inc., the parties told the court they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The court canceled the scheduled conferences and other deadlines.

The court dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. It directed the clerk to terminate pending motions and close the case.

Judge Caproni allowed the parties 30 days to seek reopening for good cause. They could also ask the court to retain authority to enforce their settlement by filing the settlement agreement and a request for that authority within 30 days.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Chevrestt v. Barstool Sports, Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-01949
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
May 27, 2020

Background

On May 26, 2020, the parties notified the court that they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The order does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

Order

The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The clerk was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.

The parties were permitted to apply to reopen the case within 30 days, but any application had to show good cause for keeping the case open despite the settlement. The order states that a request filed after 30 days, or without a showing of good cause, could be denied on that basis alone.

If the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction—that is, continuing authority—to enforce their settlement agreement, they had to submit the agreement and request an order expressly retaining that authority within the same 30-day period.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.