Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 16, 2020

Reid v. Kataoka U.S. LTD.

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:19-cv-07649
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Reid v. Kataoka U.S. LTD., Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice and without costs.

Who this affects

Valentine Reid, the other persons he represented as similarly situated, and Kataoka U.S., Ltd. The case was dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party; the parties could seek reopening or retained authority to enforce the settlement within 30 days under the order’s conditions.

What happened

In Reid v. Kataoka U.S. LTD., the court was notified that the parties had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The order does not describe the agreement’s terms.

The court canceled all scheduled conferences and other deadlines, terminated all open motions, and directed the clerk to close the case. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party.

Judge Valerie Caproni ordered that the parties could ask to reopen the case within 30 days by showing good cause. The parties could also ask the court to retain authority to enforce their settlement by submitting the agreement and a separate request within that same period.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Reid v. Kataoka U.S. LTD. · No. 1:19-cv-07649
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Sept. 16, 2020

Background

The order states that, on September 14, 2020, Magistrate Judge Sarah Cave notified the court that the parties had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The order does not provide the settlement’s terms or describe the underlying claims.

Court’s action

The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The clerk was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.

Reopening and settlement enforcement

Within 30 days, the parties could apply to reopen the case. Such an application had to show good cause for keeping the case open despite the settlement and had to be filed within that 30-day period. The court stated that a late request or one lacking a showing of good cause could be denied on that basis alone.

If the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction—the court’s authority—to enforce their settlement agreement, they had to submit the agreement under Rule 6.A of the court’s Individual Practices and request an order expressly retaining that authority within the same 30-day period.

Disposition

Judge Valerie Caproni dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, terminated the open motions, and closed the case, subject to the stated 30-day procedures for reopening or requesting retained authority to enforce the settlement.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.